Seeing consciousness as a rolling ball by Dr Elizabeth McCardell, M. of Counselling, PhD
Dec 2012
Dec 2012
Imagine a beach ball
rolling around in a swimming pool, or in the ocean. The top surface of the ball
rolls to below the surface of the water and then rolls right over so that what
was previously on top returns there. The ball rocks a bit in relation to small
waves, rolling again, rocking once more. Maybe you are imagining you are the
rocking ball in the water, maybe you are not. Maybe you can sense the water
around you; maybe you cannot sense the water. Maybe…, maybe not? Whether or not
you are the ball or are watching the imaginary ball, its rocking and rolling motion
in water has a nice calming quality to it. It’s hard to resist.
This scenario could
well be part of a hypnotic induction process where relaxation and yet
concentration and focus allow for some profound changes to take place at a holistic level in the person
being hypnotised, but it also serves to illustrate how non-psychodynamic,
non-psychoanalytic theorists are
thinking about consciousness. The rolling
ball image contrasts with the image of the iceberg where the conscious
mind is illustrated as being the small bit above the surface of the water with
the unconscious mind the huge iceberg below. Psychoanalysts, following Freud,
think of consciousness in terms of an iceberg; non-psychoanalysts view
consciousness more like a ball in water. I much prefer the rolling ball
metaphor. There is fluidity here, fluidity and flexibility, and endless
shifting change.
There are implications
for therapy according to how we see consciousness and unconsciousness. For
iceberg theorists and therapists, the work is always about ameliorating
suffering at an unconscious level, as what is viewed as the conscious mind is
only the “tip of the iceberg”, and a symptom is seen as coming out of “the unconscious”. “The unconscious” according to
those following psychoanalytic thought is an actual place; a cauldron of psychic energy which
fizzes out in uncontrolled bursts in neurotics. I realize I have lots of mixed
metaphors here, but they are only metaphors, which we can make up however we
please and according to how we see the world. The cauldron of psychic energy metaphor was that described by
Freud (1856-1939), following his interest in the new technology of steam
engines. Neurologically, there isn’t an unconscious mind nor a conscious one,
but of course, the mind isn’t well accounted for in neurology. That aside, I
want to promote consciousness in terms of the rolling ball analogy because I
believe it is a very useful one.
A rolling ball
theorist/therapist has a view of consciousness that sees consciousness as that
which is visible now and invisible next and visible again. Notice how this
analogy does not talk of an unconscious as an entity. Here is a view of
consciousness that is visible sometimes and invisible sometimes as well. This is
a consciousness of awareness and unawareness that is always relational to
actual contexts, memories, and ideas. There is no storage place of unthought thoughts, but emergent or
forgotten thoughts and emotions that under the right circumstances are
remembered. These remembered thoughts and emotions and experiences may or may
not be objectively or forensically verifiable, but have a veracity for the
person involved. It is this sense of truthfulness that matters and can be
brought into therapy, or not.
My work is with what
is and what next emerges in my conversation with my client at that time. There
is only what presents itself in
our interaction. Insights arise on both sides, for me and for her. These are
insights that enrich and expand my client’s awareness, as well as my own. This
contrasts with a psychoanalytic approach where the therapist sits in a position
of power and decision working with what they decide is important. The client’s
input is restricted to what the therapist considers important, just as the
image of a solid iceberg (clearly not one melting under the impact of climate
change) restricts an understanding of what consciousness is actually capable
of: in this view, fixed and inflexible.
The rolling ball view
of consciousness has changed how therapy is done substantially and it has also
changed how clinical hypnosis is practiced, just as a matter of interest. No
longer a swinging watch on a chain, no longer a “look into my eyes,” no longer
“you are going deeper and deeper,” no longer a maestro controlling a patient;
instead there is now a gentle collaborative process with a recognition that the
client will hear what is important to them and make meaning according to their
own experience, that a good hypnotist and therapist will change the course of a
therapeutic session according to what is reported by the client and what is
observed as present by the therapist. Hypnosis and other forms of non-psychoanalytic psychotherapy
becomes a nurturing and change making process.
What emerges in
therapy and hypnosis can be extraordinary and a powerful generator of change
at a habit reducing level, the
level of psychological and physical pain, for managing obsessive behaviours,
for lack of self confidence, and a number of other debilitating issues, as well
as bringing a greater number of choices to every day life. The beauty of the
rolling, rocking ball in water analogy is that we can choose, or not choose,
what we want to change.
Copyright @ 3013 Dr Elizabeth McCardell
Copyright @ 3013 Dr Elizabeth McCardell